|
Post by dwolfe on Feb 12, 2014 2:55:53 GMT
I always wanted to use this verse when people try to say that chewing tobacco is evil or that the body is the temple of the lord. The pharisees were offended when Jesus ate without washing his hands. I relate this to people being offended by someone chewing tobacco. Now I know it isnt the best or cleanest of habits, but I dont agree with trying to twist scripture to meet things they are not meant for. It isnt what we put into our mouths that defile us, it is what comes out our mouths that defile us because what comes out of our mouth is what is in our heart according to scripture.
Interesting also is the verse that goes along with many, v.23 - "All these evil things come from within, and defile the man." Man is not inherently good like humanism would have us believe. So much so that it grieved God that he had made man in Noah's time.
|
|
Lee
Administrator
Posts: 1,047
|
Post by Lee on Feb 12, 2014 3:32:20 GMT
I'm having a little difficulty wrapping my hands around this. Just earlier this week we read that Christ had sent the devils into the swine, which showed they had no reason being in the land.
I can definitely see how these verses applies to us now, as we aren't under the Mosaic law now, however they were still at this time. Would eating pork have defiled a man at this time? Is the answer that it was a transitionary time, or am I missing something here?
|
|
|
Post by gsmithb on Feb 12, 2014 4:11:52 GMT
I have wanted to say this for a long time......I could be very wrong about the following. I have thought that God declared certain animals unclean because they have unclean circumstances. For example, catfish are unclean because they are bottom feeders. Pigs tend to eat anything dead or otherwise. They are noted for tricinella parasites. We would not eat mice or rats, for obvious reasons. Hawks eat anything dead or alive. I don't know if this is for all unclean animals. Something for us to write about.
|
|
|
Post by dwolfe on Feb 13, 2014 0:17:58 GMT
These kind of questions should remain with us as we continue in our readings, and sometimes other instances will shed light on it. It is strange though, I haven't (once again) searched for anything in the pioneer writings about it, but it is certainly an aspect that we should explore further.
|
|