jopa
Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by jopa on May 2, 2014 15:55:58 GMT
We know that the cities of refuge were for the manslayers that unintentionally killed someone but if it was an accident, but why did Yahweh allow the person to still be persued and possibly caught and killed by the avenger of blood? As verse 6 says- "lest the avenger of blood in hot anger pursue the manslayer and overtake him, because the way is long, and strike him fatally, the THE MAN DID NOT DESERVE TO DIE, since he did not hate his neighbor in the past.
Why allow any avenger of blood at all? Why not outlaw it altogether?
|
|
Lee
Administrator
Posts: 1,047
|
Post by Lee on May 3, 2014 21:29:17 GMT
The Cities of Refuge. The shedding of blood avenged by the nearest male relative, it therefore became desirable to appoint cities where a man who had killed another might fly. The land was about 144 miles long, the cities would therefore be about 40 miles apart, no man would have to go above 20 miles to reach his refuge. When he reached the City of Refuge, the manslayer was tried, and if found guilty of murder, was given up to the avenger, if not, he had to remain in the city until the death of the High Priest (see Num. 35.). Christ is our City of Refuge, if we remain in him we are safe; outside death awaits us. Let us all abide in him (John 15:4, 6–7). The Lord will be a refuge to the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble (Psa. 9:9–10).
. Vol. 38: The Christadelphian: Volume 38. 2001 (electronic ed.) (226). Birmingham: Christadelphian Magazine & Publishing Association.
|
|
Lee
Administrator
Posts: 1,047
|
Post by Lee on May 3, 2014 21:41:32 GMT
We haven't killed anyone, yet we have a City of Refuge (Christ), because we are all worthy of death. Maybe it is to show that we all deserve death, and need a place of refuge? Any other thoughts?
|
|